|
|
|
You
don't need a detective to uncover the true costs of a pump installation.
A Life Cycle Costs (LCC) analysis makes it possible to figure the cost of
a pump installation over its lifetime, including energy usage, operational
costs, maintenance and other big-ticket items.
LCC
analysis has long been used in other industry sectors, but it is only beginning
to be used to evaluate pumping systems. Gunnar Hovstadius, director of technology
for ITT Fluid Technology, says that is very good news.
"An
LCC analysis will give the end user an opportunity to save money in the
long run," he says. "Too often a pump purchase is based almost
exclusively on the initial purchase price. But if you have an energy-intensive
application and a big pump, a 10 percent increase in efficiency might more
than recover the original purchasing costs."
Pump
Life Cycle Costs: A Guide to LCC Analysis for Pumping Systems is a result
of a joint effort by the Hydraulic Institute, an association of pump producers
in North America, and Europump, which represents 15 national pump manufacturing
associations in Europe and more than 400 manufacturers. The US Department
of Energy's Office of Industrial Technologies also collaborated in the project.
The guide describes essential pumping system components and explains how
to write specifications, design and operate a system for minimum life cycle
costs.
"Purchasing
departments are, unfortunately, rewarded on how cheaply they can buy something,
not on the product's life cycle costs," says Hovstadius. "The
easiest thing is just to look at the initial price."
Judging from the experience in other sectors, that
kind of thinking may soon change in the pumping industry. Airlines have
employed lcc analysis for years in the purchase of aircraft. Large military
procurements of airplanes, tanks and carriers are also often based on lcc
analysis. The trucking industry considers this type of analysis a valuable
tool in making a rational purchase.
In
Hovstadius' view, improving pump system performance is too often overlooked
as an opportunity to contain costs. Pumping systems account for nearly 20
percent of the world's electrical energy demand, and in some industrial
operations account for 25 to 50 percent of the energy usage. By understanding
the components of pump ownership and how they can be influenced, the owner
can "dramatically reduce energy, operational and maintenance costs,"
he says.
The
LCC of any piece of equipment is the total expense of purchasing, installing,
operating, maintaining and disposing of the equipment. LCC is determined
by following a methodology that identifies and quantifies all of those components.
Used as a tool to compare alternatives - buying a new design or overhauling
the old one, for instance - the LCC process shows the most cost-effective
solution within the limits of available data.
The
components of an LCC analysis typically include initial price, installation
and commissioning costs, energy expenditures, operational costs, maintenance
and repair costs, downtime costs, environmental costs, and the cost of decommissioning
and disposing of the equipment when its useful life is over.
In
some installations, energy consumption is the dominating cost in the LCC,
especially in pumps that are run more than 2,000 hours per year, says Hovstadius.
In other installations, maintenance is the heaviest cost. The cost of unexpected
downtime and lost production can, in some cases, be greater than the cost
of energy use and replacement.
"The
most difficult part to estimate is the maintenance costs, because you don't
know how long the equipment will last or how often it will break down over
the typical lifetime of a pump, which is 20 years. That is very difficult
for the manufacturer to estimate because it depends on how the machine is
being used and where on the curve it is being operated," explains Hovstadius.
In
this instance, common sense plays a role. "If you buy a car, it will
last longer if you drive it carefully than if you race it. It's the same
thing with a pump."
A
possible way to address these costs is through service contracts, in which
the price of maintenance is set from the beginning, but this assumes that
the party taking on the risk has some influence over how the system is operated.
Proper
system design is the most important single element in minimising LCC, says
Hovstadius. This means evaluating the interaction between the pump and the
rest of the system and calculating the operating duty point or points. All
pumping systems comprise a pump, a driver, pipe installation and operating
controls, and each of these elements is considered individually. The characteristics
of the piping system must be calculated to determine required pump performance.
"Regardless
of the type of pump you've purchased, it will be cheaper to run if you've
designed the system to run in an optimal way," says Hovstadius.
|
Sidebar:
N-Pump fares well in LCC analysis
ITT Flygt has
been employing LCC analysis in evaluating certain of its products,
including the N-pump. This pump stands up very well in LCC analysis
because it is more efficient and requires less maintenance than
traditional pumps. The N-pump uses less energy and has less of a
tendency to clog, so sustained efficiency is higher.
"If
you don't have to go and unclog the pump regularly, you save a lot
of money on maintenance," says Gunnar Hovstadius, director
of technology for ITT Fluid Techno-logy. In some N-pump installations,
energy costs have been cut by as much as 25 percent. Pump stations
that frequently sounded the alarm for emergency maintenance are
now running without any alarms at all.
"So
even if a pump is a little more expensive to purchase, it can still
make a lot of sense, because the initial costs may only be 5 to
10 percent of the total lifetime operating costs," Hovstadius
says.
|
© ITT Flygt AB, Solna, Sweden,
2001. All rights reserved.
|
|